Σύγκριση εκδόσεων
Εδώ βλέπετε τις διαφορές μεταξύ της επιλεγμένης έκδοσης και της τρέχουσας έκδοσης της σελίδας.
| Προηγούμενος έλεγχος και από τις δύο πλευρές Προηγούμενη αναθεώρηση | Τελευταία αναθεώρησηΕπόμενος έλεγχος και από τις δύο πλευρές | ||
| introduction [2017/09/24 15:18] – pournaras | introduction [2017/09/24 15:19] – [INTRODUCTION TO THE 2017 LAWS OF DUPLICATE BRIDGE] pournaras | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Γραμμή 31: | Γραμμή 31: | ||
| The trend, begun in 2007, to give Tournament Directors more discretion in enforcing the Law has been continued and attempts have been made to clarify interpretations. The Committee intends to prepare a separate official Commentary containing examples to help in this respect. | The trend, begun in 2007, to give Tournament Directors more discretion in enforcing the Law has been continued and attempts have been made to clarify interpretations. The Committee intends to prepare a separate official Commentary containing examples to help in this respect. | ||
| - | Established usage has been retained in regard to “;;may;;” do (failure to do it is not wrong), “;;does;;” (establishes procedure without suggesting that violation be penalised) “;;should;;” do (failure to do it is an infraction jeopardising the infractor’s rights but not often penalised), | + | Established usage has been retained in regard to “may” do (failure to do it is not wrong), “does” (establishes procedure without suggesting that violation be penalised) “should” do (failure to do it is an infraction jeopardising the infractor’s rights but not often penalised), |
| For the avoidance of doubt, this Introduction and the Definitions that follow form part of the Laws. | For the avoidance of doubt, this Introduction and the Definitions that follow form part of the Laws. | ||